Not that the post you link to makes any sense, but ah, yes, Forrestor and Schundler are certainly mainstream. And the wingnuts that run your national party and dominate all decisions based on solely on religious zealotry and big business are sure moderate in tone and message.
Hmmm....wasn't Corzine "Mr. Big Business" himself to the detriment of the ordinary working joe? The employees he fired when he took over Goldman Sachs would attest to that while his activities at the same corporation didn't seem to do much for employees of other corporations like ENRON or likewise investors that were enticed into buying stocks that weren't properly valued thru laddering schemes and the like during his tenure. If Corzine was serious about regulating big business excesses he should have gone to Congress while directly involved in the industry using his bully pulpit as head of Goldman Sachs to effect real change rather than posturing after the fact and after he received his 350 million plus. Corzine's so-called socialist agenda doesn't spread wealth as much as it seems to spread poverty to the greatest majority....unless you are a political boss in NJ that can tap him like an ATM machine whenever you want. As far as religious bigotry goes most people in most religions (and there are always exceptions) are pretty tolerate of other peoples' practices or non-practices but that does not appear to be the case for those that oppose religion in general. Maybe that's the reason when looking at the past election it appears the general population is less fearful of the so-called intolerant right and more fearful of an intolerant left.
3 Comments:
Not that the post you link to makes any sense, but ah, yes, Forrestor and Schundler are certainly mainstream. And the wingnuts that run your national party and dominate all decisions based on solely on religious zealotry and big business are sure moderate in tone and message.
Do you have any facts to back up your comments or do you just make it up as you go along?
Hmmm....wasn't Corzine "Mr. Big Business" himself to the detriment of the ordinary working joe? The employees he fired when he took over Goldman Sachs would attest to that while his activities at the same corporation didn't seem to do much for employees of other corporations like ENRON or likewise investors that were enticed into buying stocks that weren't properly valued thru laddering schemes and the like during his tenure. If Corzine was serious about regulating big business excesses he should have gone to Congress while directly involved in the industry using his bully pulpit as head of Goldman Sachs to effect real change rather than posturing after the fact and after he received his 350 million plus. Corzine's so-called socialist agenda doesn't spread wealth as much as it seems to spread poverty to the greatest majority....unless you are a political boss in NJ that can tap him like an ATM machine whenever you want. As far as religious bigotry goes most people in most religions (and there are always exceptions) are pretty tolerate of other peoples' practices or non-practices but that does not appear to be the case for those that oppose religion in general. Maybe that's the reason when looking at the past election it appears the general population is less fearful of the so-called intolerant right and more fearful of an intolerant left.
Post a Comment
<< Home