"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance

 and a people who mean to be their own governors

 must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Forrester's Plan For Property Tax Reduction

Doug Forrester has unveiled a plan that would provide homeowners with a 30 percent reduction in their property tax bills up to a maximum of $5,000. Forrester's proposal is similar to a tax relief plan described last week by Republicans in the state’s assembly. Both plans call for a constitutional amendment that would require the state to refund a proscribed percent of every homeowner’s property tax bill.

Forrester said his plan would be phased in over three years and would be paid for though a combination of spending cuts, including the lay off of state employees and savings achieved from slashing fraud and government excesses.

We applaud Forrester’s call for cuts in state spending - obviously fraud and government excesses should be eliminated. The Democrats have not been good stewards of our money. As the majority party, they have spent the state to the brink of bankruptcy, all the while ignoring the property tax crisis.

We are also encouraged to see another candidate for Governor has laid out a plan for property tax reduction. Pushing the problem off to a state constitutional convention is merely kicking the problem down the road, with relief well beyond the horizon. It’s a way to pretend action will be taken, when in reality it’s a hope the problem will just go away or circumstances will allow a lucky Governor to leave the mess for the next office holder.

If the Democrats can’t solve the problem when they control both state houses and the Governor’s seat, we can safely say that the incumbents lack the willingness or the skill to get the job done. The property tax crisis requires sound policy and leadership, not business as usual and abrogation of responsibility.

Candidates for Governor without a property tax reduction plan should not seriously be considered for the position. “I’ll unveil my plan later” means either the candidate has no plan or believes his plan can not withstand the scrutiny of voters. We’ve heard about secret plans before and we would suggest voters not fall for the campaign tactic again.

Having said all that, are we pleased with Forrester’s plan? Frankly, no. We had hoped Forrester would propose a plan to limit the growth in government spending – the real cause of high taxes. Forrester’s plan does not address this fundamental problem.

Property taxes are high in New Jersey for one reason – spending on public schools that has increased dramatically over the past several years. New Jersey already spends more per pupil than any other state and still, it is never enough.

Think about it, is there some magic spending number out there that would satisfy New Jersey’s educators? The United States spends more money on education per child than any country in the world. New Jersey spends more per student than any other state, making us the greatest education spenders on earth.

Can someone please tell us the spending target against which our commitment to school children is being measured? It’s very discouraging, all that money spent on public schools and in return the state’s education system produces average results.

To hear people talk you’d think New Jersey’s spending on public education was an embarrassment. The “more money for education” mantra has been drilled into everyone’s head to the point that most people actually believe we’re not spending enough. Let’s cut to the chase, we want greater results from our state’s education system, not greater tax bills. The two should not be confused.

Clearly, something is wrong with the system and spending more money isn’t going to fix the problem. In reality we have been rewarding mediocre school performance with the biggest compensation package in the world. There is no incentive for the state’s education system to change, the money rolls in no matter the results. Actually, the worse the school’s performance, the more money demanded from taxpayers.

This is what makes Forrester’s property tax plan so disheartening. His plan does nothing to rein in the growth of public school spending at the local level and it may even exacerbate the problem. How could a property tax refund potentially make the situation worse? Well, as we noted yesterday, when voters reject school budgets, school boards can appeal the voter’s decision to the state Department of Education. The department will be able to cite the “huge” property tax relief voter’s receive from the state and decide increases to school budgets are warranted because the” taxpayers can afford it”.

The state Board of Education goes against the wishes of the voters in most cases today, just think of the increases the state will be willing to approve under this new plan. The state will paint the property tax refunds as some sort of gift from Trenton, not unlike the property taxes rebates of today. The refunds may be enshrined in the state’s constitution, but will be treated as some sort of manna from the state, to be exploited for additional public school spending.

Another complicating factor is New Jersey state aid for public school funding. State revenue budgeted for education is not distributed to local districts in an equitable manner, such as through a per pupil calculation. Some districts receive a lot, some a little and some receive no state aid at all. Obviously, the school districts that receive little to no state aid rely more heavily on property taxes to fund schools.

We believe this is the problem Forrester’s plan is attempting to fix. The plan is an effort to distribute state education aid back to the taxpayer, rather than directly to the local school district. As we noted earlier, taxpayer refunds will end up in the public school budgets unless school spending is brought under control. Unfortunately, there’s nothing in the Forrester plan to put the breaks on the ever increasing state budget for education or for any other category of state spending for that matter.

Even under the assumption that during the first few years, the Governor and legislature can cut spending to fund the property tax refunds, what’s to stop out of control spending by Trenton in the future? Deficits never stood in the way of double digit increases to state spending in the past and there is nothing to suggest the future will be any different.

So after all the fraud and waste has been cut out of the budget, how will the new constitutionally mandated property tax refunds be “paid” for by the state in the future? Trenton will revert to the same method used last year to fund the property tax rebates – new and/ or higher income, sales and a myriad of taxes and fees imposed by the state.

Even if by some miracle, local property taxes don’t gobble up your state refund, you’ll be paying Trenton the identical amount in additional state taxes. Why add to the cost of government and make a project out of returning money you had in the beginning? It’s like taking money out of one pocket and putting it into the other, only extremely slowly, inefficiently and with a surcharge for the transfer.

While a step in the right direction, the Forrester/Republican assembly plan needs work. Bret Schundler has a plan that calls for a constitutional amendment to cap the growth in state spending coupled with property tax reduction.

We’ll take a proven long term tax solution over a quick, short term fix – we’ve been down the rebate/refund road before and we have nothing to show for the effort but substantially larger tax bills. If we’re going to amend the constitution, let’s solve the real problem, growth in government spending.


At 9:03 AM, Anonymous Greg said...

As they say in the Land Down Under, "Cheers mates". Great post - you make some really great points here. Of course I agree, but that goes without saying.

At 11:10 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's typical-although Forrester like to posture about how the Democrats refuse to control spending he and other Republicans lose credibility when thay also put forward half-assed plans to avoid confrontation with those same special interest groups-neither political party is really serious about reform-as you say-the Democrats are in the majority right now and they can institute reforms if they want to...this constitutional convention nonsense is just to postpone dealing with the issue....

At 11:45 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

-and Corzine, who patted McGreevey on the back, telling him what a great job he was doing, just sits back and laughs at us as he and Norcross have already bought the election and control the hacks in the legislature. Although recognizably inefficient (but we should be used to that by now) due to the pervasive corruption in this state which is way beyond any type of control at this point we need to set up some sort of an election process, say on a two-day weekend, where each year an election is held for all seats in Trenton including governor...it's the only way left where we can raise accountability when both parties either directly or indirectly collaborate with each other as they are given too much of a grace period between elections to engage in graft...let them "campaign" on the legislation they passed that year

At 11:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

-this year is an excellent example of having yearly elections-it's an election year and "now" and "all of a sudden" they are concerned about government waste and the taxes they have dumped on us...

At 11:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

-and give a tax "credit" that can use on their state income tax form to every person who can show they registered and voted...considering the graft in this state at least use some of the money for a good purpose..

At 11:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't type well....sorry

At 2:11 AM, Blogger 贝贝 said...

The Tax Return Crack-Up<3>
Granted, there are usuallyMicrosoft Office 2010write-ups when presidential contenders make their tax returns available, but the coverage falls far short of the Office 2010
full court press (pardon the pun) that the Clintons have received. What's Microsoft Office 2007different now?Office 2007One possibility is that most upper middle class Democrats, and therefore most Microsoft OfficeOffice 2007 keyeditors and reporters of our nation's big papers as well as Office 2007 downloadtelevision producers, are Obama supporters who think that Hillary should hurry up Office 2007 Professionaland drop out of the race already.Microsoft outlook
Microsoft outlook 2010Whom elite liberals are pulling for really does shape political coverage in ways

At 8:25 AM, Anonymous Patrick said...

The chap is definitely just, and there is no doubt.
kelowna real estate listings | hotels san antonio | tile flooring ideas


Post a Comment

<< Home

 Contact Us

  • Email Us
  • Blog Roll Us!



  • Atom Feed
  • Bloglines
  • Feedburner
  • Feedster
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My MSN
  • Add to My Yahoo
  • News Is Free

    Recent Posts

  • Dean And The Money Changers
  • New Jersey’s Sham School Elections
  • How Low Can Corzine Go?
  • Jon Corzine, The Lodestone
  • Gorbachev Kids Codey
  • Lautenberg Has Become The Senate’s Number One Kook...
  • Reading The Tea Leaves
  • Meet The Enlighten-NewJersey Gang
  • DeLay Can’t Hold A Candle to Corzine
  • Tax Revolt!


  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • April 2008
  • November 2008
  • January 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • February 2012

    Online Journals

  • National Review

  • Opinion Journal

  • Real Clear Politics

  • Weekly Standard

  • Blog Roll

  • A Blog For All
  • Althouse
  • Ankle Biting Pundits
  • Barista of Bloomfield Avenue
  • Betsy's Page
  • Blue Crab Boulevard
  • Blogs For Condi
  • Bob the Corgi
  • Brainster's Blog
  • BuzzMachine
  • Captain's Quarter's
  • Cinnaman
  • Coalition of the Swilling
  • CWA-NJ
  • Dino's Forum
  • Daily Mail
  • Don Surber
  • DynamoBuzz
  • eCache
  • Exit 4
  • Fausta's Blog
  • GOP Bloggers
  • Instapundit
  • Joe's Journal
  • Kate Spot
  • Kausfiles.com
  • Little Green Footballs
  • Michelle Malkin
  • More Mnmouth Musings
  • Parkway Rest Stop
  • Patrick Ruffini
  • Polipundit
  • Power Line
  • Right Wing News
  • Roger L. Simon
  • The Blue State Conservatives
  • Riehl World View
  • Red Jersey
  • Right, Wing-Nut!
  • Sid in the City
  • Tiger Hawk
  • The Truth Laid Bear
  • Tim Blair
  • Wizbang

  • Sid in the City

    Majority Accountability Project


    New Jersey Blogs


  • 11th and Washington

  • A Blog For All
  • A Planet Where Apes Evolved From Man?!?
  • Armies of Liberation
  • Atlantic Highland Muse
  • Attack of the 15.24 Mete

  • Barista of Bloomfield Avenue
  • BeLow Me
  • Big Windbag
  • Blanton's and Ashton's
  • Blue State Conservatives
  • Burning Feathers
  • BuzzMachine

  • Clifton Blogs
  • Coalition of the Swilling
  • Cobweb Studios
  • CoffeeGrounds
  • Constitutional Conservative
  • Confessions of a Jersey Goddess
  • Corzine Watch
  • Crazy Jackie
  • Cresting Acrocorinthus
  • Cripes, Suzette!

  • Daniella's Misadventures
  • Did I Say That Out Loud
  • Dojo Mojo
  • Dossy's Blog
  • Down the Shore
  • DynamoBuzz

  • eCache
  • Enlighten-NewJersey
  • Eye On Hoboken
  • Exit 4
  • Exit Zero
  • Extreme-Psychosis

  • Fausta's Blog
  • Fausti's Book Quest
  • Fractals of Change
  • Frenchtown NJ Blog

  • GiggleChick
  • Gregg Gethard's Amazing Personal Journey
  • goethe re scape

  • Hoboken Rock City

  • IamBillPower
  • If this is paradise, I wish I had a lawn-mower
  • Imaginary Therapy
  • Inadmissible Evidence

  • Jersey Beat
  • Jersey Perspective
  • Jersey Side
  • Jersey Style
  • Jersey Writers
  • Joe's Journal

  • Karl's Corner
  • Kate Spot

  • Laughing At The Pieces
  • Likelihood of Confusion
  • Liss Is More

  • Mamacita
  • Mary's Lame Attempt at Fame
  • Media in Trouble
  • Michael Carroll
  • Mister Snitch!
  • MucknMire
  • My Life as a Rabid Blog
  • My New Jersey

  • New Jersey Eminent Domain Law
  • NJ Conservative
  • NJ Fiscal Folly
  • New Jersey For Change
  • New Jersey Weblogs
  • NJ Spoken Word
  • Northeast Corridor

  • Parkway Rest Stop
  • Philly2Hoboken.com
  • Poetic Leanings
  • Poor Impulse Control
  • Professor Kim's News Notes
  • Property Tax NJ

  • Rain Angel
  • Riehl World View

  • Shamrocketship
  • Shipwrecks
  • SloppyDawg
  • Sluggo Needs a Nap
  • SmadaNeK
  • Static Silence

  • Tami,The One True
  • Tammany on the Hudson
  • Tequila Shots For The Soul
  • The Art of Getting By
  • The Center of New Jersey Life
  • The Daily Fry
  • The Duc Pond
  • The Jersey Shore Real Estate Bubble
  • The Joy of Soup
  • The Mark(ings) of Zorro
  • The New Wisdom
  • The Nightfly
  • The Opinion Mill
  • The Pink Panther
  • The Political Dogs
  • The Rix Mix
  • This Full House
  • Tiger Hawk
  • Tomato Nation
  • Toxiclabrat
  • Twisty

  • Unbillable Hours
  • Usdin.Net

  • Where Is The Remote
  • Wine Goddess

  • Xpatriated Texan

  • Links

  • NJ Governor
  • NJ Legislature
  • Bob Menendez Information

  • Blog Rings

  • Blog Explosion
  • Blog Directory
  • Blogsnow
  • Blogwise
  • Blogstreet
  • Blogshares
  • Blogarama
  • Blog Digger
  • Daypop
  • Globe of Blogs
  • Blog Search Engine

  • Ecosystem Status

  • Who Links Here